Definition: It came to pass also in the twelfth year, in the fifteenth [day] of the month, [that] the word of the LORD came unto me, saying,

Explanation: Okay, let's break down this passage from Ezekiel 32:17. It’s a really interesting and somewhat mysterious part of scripture! Here’s what it means in simpler terms: “It came to pass also in the twelfth year, in the fifteenth [day] of the month, [that] the word of the LORD came unto me.” Let's unpack that: “It came to pass also…” : This is a way of saying “And it happened also…” It’s a bit dramatic and emphasizes that this is an unusual event. “in the twelfth year…” : This refers to the 12th year of the reign of King Cyrus, which was a significant time in ancient Israel. Think of it as a turning point. “…in the fifteenth [day] of the month…” : This tells us when this event happened – it was on the fifteenth day of the month. The “[day]” is important; it’s specifying that it's a specific date within the 12th year. “that” : This word signals a connection or continuation of something before. It’s like saying, “And then…” or “Because of this…” “the word of the LORD came unto me” : This is the core of the verse. The "LORD" is a title for God, and “word” means speech or message. So, what happened is that God spoke to me . So, putting it all together: This passage describes a moment when God directly communicated with someone – likely an angel or a prophet – in the 12th year of King Cyrus's reign. It’s a very significant event because it suggests divine revelation and communication. Why is this important? Ezekiel 32:17 is considered one of the most mysterious passages in the Bible. It’s often interpreted as a sign that God was trying to reveal something important or challenging to someone, and it's been debated for centuries what this "message" actually was. It’s a classic example of how biblical texts can be open to multiple interpretations. In short, it’s a story about God speaking directly to an individual in a specific time and place. --- Do you want me to: Explain why this passage is significant? Discuss a possible interpretation of what the "message" might have been?